Negócios em Emersão  ·  Vamos Emergir?  ·  Cadastre-se e ganhe 50 REC de bonus

Beyond the Petri dish: Testing tomorrow's drugs in human blood

Redação Recifes
21 visualizações
Beyond the Petri dish: Testing tomorrow's drugs in human blood

by Ingebjørg Hestvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Robert Egan

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

The COVID vaccine is perhaps the first thing many people think of when they hear about mRNA-based drugs. Small packages of genetic material are sent into the body, prompting cells to produce useful proteins in the fight against the virus. But the list of diseases that can potentially be treated with mRNA-based drugs is much broader than vaccines. mRNA is expected to be used to treat disorders including cardiovascular diseases, rare hereditary diseases and autoimmune diseases—and not least, cancer.

"Almost all diseases we know are caused by some protein or another. Either there's too much protein, or too little, or the protein has a defect. Proteins are encoded by mRNA. The potential for mRNA drugs is therefore enormous. They will be a very important tool," says researcher Sjoerd Hak from SINTEF's Department of Biotechnology and Nanomedicine.

Researchers at SINTEF have tried a new method that will make it easier to develop new forms of mRNA drugs. The research is published in the European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics.

Trial and error

A major reason why so many drugs fail during testing is the big difference between humans and the animals used in preclinical testing. What may look promising when tested in mice may have zero effect or even cause serious side effects when injected into a patient's bloodstream.

One of the major challenges in the development of mRNA-based drugs is the way the mRNA is packaged. mRNA is unstable, and to be used as a drug, the small piece of genetic material must be packaged in small fat particles. In technical terms, these particles are called lipid nanoparticles, or simply LNPs.

Of all drugs that are tested in clinical trials on humans, 90% are not approved. Therefore, it is important to be able to identify the best drugs and weed out the bad candidates before you get to that point, says Hak.

When the tiny particles are injected into the blood, the outer fatty layer binds to proteins in the blood plasma, and the nanoparticle encounters immune cells circulating in the blood. What happens next—whether the immune cell "eats" the particle and what happens inside the immune cell afterward—will determine the effect of the medicine.

"LNPs can be made in a thousand different ways. How they are put together is crucial for how the mRNA will enter the cells and function as medicine. That is why you have to create and test a lot of different variants," says Hak.

Human blood as a test environment

Hak and his colleagues have now looked at how to test the drugs in human donor blood, instead of injecting the drugs into the body.

By using human whole blood, that is, fresh blood that contains all blood cells and plasma, the researchers tested different mRNA-LNP particles and how they were taken up by immune cells in the blood. They also looked at which signal substances the cells produced. Signal substances control the immune response and are an important part of how the drugs work.

The results show that this method enables researchers to see which variants of mRNA-LNP had the greatest uptake by immune cells and which triggered strong or weak activation of the immune system.

"The results show that testing with human whole blood outside the body—ex vivo testing—can be a useful addition to today's preclinical testing in laboratory animals," Hak says.

"Since the blood is human, the findings may also be more relevant to what will actually happen in humans, compared to the findings in experimental animals."

"At the same time, it is important to state that this testing is only a small piece of the bigger puzzle," Hak explains. "But it allows you to decide earlier on whether it is worth continuing. You can weed out bad trial candidates at an early stage and instead select the ones that are most promising. And you can do it not only in mice, but also in human blood."

Cheaper cancer treatment

Hak highlights the new CAR-T therapy as an example of medicine for which testing in human whole blood can provide benefits. CAR-T is a type of immunotherapy that has shown remarkable results in treating certain types of cancer.

What the field is working on now is in vivo CAR-T. Currently, T cells are removed from the patient and genetically reprogrammed in the laboratory, giving them a receptor that allows them to recognize cancer cells. Then the cells are injected back into the patient.

With mRNA technology, it is in principle possible to modify these cells in the patients themselves.

In principle, you can inject mRNA into the blood, which will then find the immune cells and give them the right receptor. If successful, an in vivo CAR-T method could reduce costs dramatically and make the treatment available to more people.

Hak believes this is a good example of a therapy that can be tested in whole blood first: "Immune cells circulate in the blood. You always want to have the cells you are looking for available. So if you test in vivo CAR-T in whole blood first, you'll quickly be able to get an impression of whether it will work or not."

The researcher also believes that testing new drugs in human whole blood before testing them on humans can reduce the risk of serious side effects.

"An important aspect of nanomedicines and mRNA-LNPs is that they can cause allergic reactions. There are some drugs where as many as half of the people who receive them have an allergic reaction."

Many patients do not experience serious reactions. But for a few, the reaction can be fatal.

"Currently, we don't have good enough models to detect such effects. They're difficult to predict. But blood has been shown to be a good predictor of such allergic reactions. By testing the medicine in blood samples first, we can better predict allergic reactions. This way, we hope to avoid people becoming seriously ill when the medicines are tested," says Hak.

Sjoerd Hak et al, Interactions between mRNA lipid nanoparticles and immune cells in fresh human whole blood, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2026.115146

Provided by Norwegian University of Science and Technology

BSc Life Sciences & Ecology. Microbiology lab background with pharmaceutical news experience in oil, gas, and renewable industries. Full profile →

Bachelor's in mathematical biology, Master's in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language. Full profile →

Discover Recifes.net

This story is part of Recifes international coverage. Explore the platform and follow us — new English social channels come next.

Artigo originalmente publicado em phys.org
Compartilhar:

Comentários

Seja o primeiro a comentar!